Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit a8535a38 authored by Christophe Geuzaine's avatar Christophe Geuzaine
Browse files

Update floating.pro

parent ed717507
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline #5689 passed
...@@ -144,12 +144,12 @@ FunctionSpace { ...@@ -144,12 +144,12 @@ FunctionSpace {
carried by that electrode. Indeed, let us consider the electrostatic weak carried by that electrode. Indeed, let us consider the electrostatic weak
formulation derived in Tutorial 1: find v in Hgrad_v_Ele such that formulation derived in Tutorial 1: find v in Hgrad_v_Ele such that
(epsilon grad v, grad v')_Vol_Ele + (n . (epsilon grad v), v')_Bnd_Vol_Ele = 0 (epsilon grad v, grad v')_Vol_Ele - (n . (epsilon grad v), v')_Bnd_Vol_Ele = 0
holds for all test functions v'. When the test-function v' is BF_electrode, holds for all test functions v'. When the test-function v' is BF_electrode,
the boundary term reduces to the boundary term reduces to
(n . (epsilon grad v), BF_electrode)_Sur_Electrodes_Ele. -(n . (epsilon grad v), BF_electrode)_Sur_Electrodes_Ele.
Since BF_electrode == 1 on the electrode, the boundary term is actually Since BF_electrode == 1 on the electrode, the boundary term is actually
simply equal to the integral of (n . epsilon grad v) on the electrode, simply equal to the integral of (n . epsilon grad v) on the electrode,
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment