Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 7bb16369 authored by Christophe Geuzaine's avatar Christophe Geuzaine
Browse files

Update microstrip.pro

parent d25b28b7
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline #
......@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ Formulation {
holds for all v', where Bnd_Vol_Ele is the boundary of Vol_Ele. In our
microstrip example this surface term vanishes, as there is either no test
function v' (on the Dirichlet boundary), or "epsilon n.Grad v" is zero
(on the homogeneous Neumann boundary. We are thus eventually looking for
(on the homogeneous Neumann boundary). We are thus eventually looking for
functions v in the function space Hgrad_v_Ele such that
(epsilon Grad v, Grad v')_Vol_Ele = 0
......@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ Formulation {
Another option, which would not work here, is to evaluate the first
argument with the last available already computed solution, i.e. simply
perform the interpolation with known coefficients vn_k. For this the Dof
prefix operator would be omitted and we would have:
prefix would be omitted and we would have:
[ epsilon[] * {d v} , {d v} ],
......@@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ Formulation {
Both choices are commonly used in different contexts, and we shall come
back on this often in subsequent tutorials. */
{ Name Electrostatics_v; Type FemEquation;
Quantity {
{ Name v; Type Local; NameOfSpace Hgrad_v_Ele; }
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment