From 7bb16369f4a94d22d74d69ba3fbc91eb7309adb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christophe Geuzaine <cgeuzaine@ulg.ac.be>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:48:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update microstrip.pro
---
Electrostatics/microstrip.pro | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Electrostatics/microstrip.pro b/Electrostatics/microstrip.pro
index 54c453e..5cf6a88 100644
--- a/Electrostatics/microstrip.pro
+++ b/Electrostatics/microstrip.pro
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ Formulation {
holds for all v', where Bnd_Vol_Ele is the boundary of Vol_Ele. In our
microstrip example this surface term vanishes, as there is either no test
function v' (on the Dirichlet boundary), or "epsilon n.Grad v" is zero
- (on the homogeneous Neumann boundary. We are thus eventually looking for
+ (on the homogeneous Neumann boundary). We are thus eventually looking for
functions v in the function space Hgrad_v_Ele such that
(epsilon Grad v, Grad v')_Vol_Ele = 0
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ Formulation {
Another option, which would not work here, is to evaluate the first
argument with the last available already computed solution, i.e. simply
perform the interpolation with known coefficients vn_k. For this the Dof
- prefix operator would be omitted and we would have:
+ prefix would be omitted and we would have:
[ epsilon[] * {d v} , {d v} ],
@@ -245,13 +245,14 @@ Formulation {
Both choices are commonly used in different contexts, and we shall come
back on this often in subsequent tutorials. */
+
{ Name Electrostatics_v; Type FemEquation;
Quantity {
{ Name v; Type Local; NameOfSpace Hgrad_v_Ele; }
}
Equation {
Integral { [ epsilon[] * Dof{d v} , {d v} ];
- In Vol_Ele; Jacobian Vol; Integration Int; }
+ In Vol_Ele; Jacobian Vol; Integration Int; }
}
}
}
--
GitLab