Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit ced94f01 authored by Christophe Geuzaine's avatar Christophe Geuzaine
Browse files

*** empty log message ***

parent cbe8d37c
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
$Id: TODO,v 1.106 2005-11-11 18:58:17 geuzaine Exp $ $Id: TODO,v 1.107 2005-11-16 18:15:35 geuzaine Exp $
******************************************************************** ********************************************************************
...@@ -28,6 +28,23 @@ On Windows without Cygwin: ...@@ -28,6 +28,23 @@ On Windows without Cygwin:
******************************************************************** ********************************************************************
allow mixed 1st/2nd order meshes (2nd order only where the geometry
requires it). Add this as an advanced option since it will create
meshes with hanging nodes.
From: Julian Swartz <swartzjp@gmail.com>
> I think that the feature may also fit under:
>
> menu: Tool -> Options
> select "Mesh"
> tab "General"
> then perhaps under "Generate second order elements" there could be an
> additional check box for "Generate second order elements only along
> curved boundaries".
>
********************************************************************
automatic exterior orientation of boundary surfaces (would greatly automatic exterior orientation of boundary surfaces (would greatly
enhance Netgen/Frontal integration). One way is to compute the solid enhance Netgen/Frontal integration). One way is to compute the solid
angle using the discretized surface. Another (probably more efficient angle using the discretized surface. Another (probably more efficient
...@@ -162,12 +179,6 @@ precision...). Rescale? ...@@ -162,12 +179,6 @@ precision...). Rescale?
******************************************************************** ********************************************************************
add the capability to mesh some entities using 1st order and some
other using 2nd order elements (in the same geometry)?
<gerard.fleury@inrs.fr>
********************************************************************
find a better way to display the time/timestep in the scale... (would find a better way to display the time/timestep in the scale... (would
be solved if we had dynamic labels). be solved if we had dynamic labels).
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment