Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
gmsh
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
GitLab community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Larry Price
gmsh
Commits
b8e9a23a
Commit
b8e9a23a
authored
22 years ago
by
Christophe Geuzaine
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Add more warnings about the robustness of the 2D aniso and 3D algorithms.
parent
e8d8c41e
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
doc/texinfo/gmsh.texi
+8
-3
8 additions, 3 deletions
doc/texinfo/gmsh.texi
with
8 additions
and
3 deletions
doc/texinfo/gmsh.texi
+
8
−
3
View file @
b8e9a23a
\input
texinfo.tex @c -*-texinfo-*-
\input
texinfo.tex @c -*-texinfo-*-
@c
$
Id: gmsh.texi,v
1
.
7
2
2003
-
07
-
07
16
:
43
:
4
6
geuzaine Exp
$
@c
$
Id: gmsh.texi,v
1
.
7
3
2003
-
07
-
19
23
:
35
:
4
4
geuzaine Exp
$
@c
@c
@c Copyright (C) 1997-2003 C. Geuzaine, J.-F. Remacle
@c Copyright (C) 1997-2003 C. Geuzaine, J.-F. Remacle
@c
@c
...
@@ -491,8 +491,8 @@ commands and command arguments to depend on previous calculations (see
...
@@ -491,8 +491,8 @@ commands and command arguments to depend on previous calculations (see
@item
@item
generate 1D, 2D and 3D simplicial (i.e.@: using line segments, triangles and
generate 1D, 2D and 3D simplicial (i.e.@: using line segments, triangles and
tetrahedra) finite element meshes. The performance of the 1D and 2D
tetrahedra) finite element meshes. The performance of the 1D and 2D
algorithms is pretty good; the 3D algorithm is still
somewhat
experimental
algorithms is pretty good; the 3D algorithm is still experimental
and slow
and slow
(see @ref
{
Mesh module
}
, and @ref
{
Tutorial
}
);
(see @ref
{
Mesh module
}
, and @ref
{
Tutorial
}
);
@item
@item
specify target element sizes accurately. Gmsh provides several mechanisms to
specify target element sizes accurately. Gmsh provides several mechanisms to
control the size of the elements in the final mesh: through interpolation
control the size of the elements in the final mesh: through interpolation
...
@@ -561,6 +561,11 @@ conforming in the sense of finite element meshes;
...
@@ -561,6 +561,11 @@ conforming in the sense of finite element meshes;
the user has no control over the quality of the mesh elements generated by
the user has no control over the quality of the mesh elements generated by
the 3D unstructured algorithm;
the 3D unstructured algorithm;
@item
@item
the 2D anisotropic and the 3D unstructured algorithms are still experimental
and not very robust. If these algorithms fail, try to change some
characteristic lengths to generate meshes that better suit the geometrical
details of the structures;
@item
Gmsh was designed to solve academic test-cases, not industrial-size
Gmsh was designed to solve academic test-cases, not industrial-size
problems. You may find that Gmsh is too slow for large problems (with
problems. You may find that Gmsh is too slow for large problems (with
thousands of geometric primitives, or millions of mesh/post-processing
thousands of geometric primitives, or millions of mesh/post-processing
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment