Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
  • cc748abcbf2b4b2ffc855b0c00e8a8490053fb21
  • master default
  • cgnsUnstructured
  • partitioning
  • poppler
  • HighOrderBLCurving
  • gmsh_3_0_4
  • gmsh_3_0_3
  • gmsh_3_0_2
  • gmsh_3_0_1
  • gmsh_3_0_0
  • gmsh_2_16_0
  • gmsh_2_15_0
  • gmsh_2_14_1
  • gmsh_2_14_0
  • gmsh_2_13_2
  • gmsh_2_13_1
  • gmsh_2_12_0
  • gmsh_2_11_0
  • gmsh_2_10_1
  • gmsh_2_10_0
  • gmsh_2_9_3
  • gmsh_2_9_2
  • gmsh_2_9_1
  • gmsh_2_9_0
  • gmsh_2_8_6
26 results

OptionsViewController.h

Blame
  • Forked from gmsh / gmsh
    Source project has a limited visibility.
    jidctfst.c 12.62 KiB
    /*
     * jidctfst.c
     *
     * Copyright (C) 1994, Thomas G. Lane.
     * This file is part of the Independent JPEG Group's software.
     * For conditions of distribution and use, see the accompanying README file.
     *
     * This file contains a fast, not so accurate integer implementation of the
     * inverse DCT (Discrete Cosine Transform).  In the IJG code, this routine
     * must also perform dequantization of the input coefficients.
     *
     * A 2-D IDCT can be done by 1-D IDCT on each column followed by 1-D IDCT
     * on each row (or vice versa, but it's more convenient to emit a row at
     * a time).  Direct algorithms are also available, but they are much more
     * complex and seem not to be any faster when reduced to code.
     *
     * This implementation is based on Arai, Agui, and Nakajima's algorithm for
     * scaled DCT.  Their original paper (Trans. IEICE E-71(11):1095) is in
     * Japanese, but the algorithm is described in the Pennebaker & Mitchell
     * JPEG textbook (see REFERENCES section in file README).  The following code
     * is based directly on figure 4-8 in P&M.
     * While an 8-point DCT cannot be done in less than 11 multiplies, it is
     * possible to arrange the computation so that many of the multiplies are
     * simple scalings of the final outputs.  These multiplies can then be
     * folded into the multiplications or divisions by the JPEG quantization
     * table entries.  The AA&N method leaves only 5 multiplies and 29 adds
     * to be done in the DCT itself.
     * The primary disadvantage of this method is that with fixed-point math,
     * accuracy is lost due to imprecise representation of the scaled
     * quantization values.  The smaller the quantization table entry, the less
     * precise the scaled value, so this implementation does worse with high-
     * quality-setting files than with low-quality ones.
     */
    
    #define JPEG_INTERNALS
    #include "jinclude.h"
    #include "jpeglib.h"
    #include "jdct.h"		/* Private declarations for DCT subsystem */
    
    #ifdef DCT_IFAST_SUPPORTED
    
    
    /*
     * This module is specialized to the case DCTSIZE = 8.
     */
    
    #if DCTSIZE != 8
      Sorry, this code only copes with 8x8 DCTs. /* deliberate syntax err */
    #endif
    
    
    /* Scaling decisions are generally the same as in the LL&M algorithm;
     * see jidctint.c for more details.  However, we choose to descale
     * (right shift) multiplication products as soon as they are formed,
     * rather than carrying additional fractional bits into subsequent additions.
     * This compromises accuracy slightly, but it lets us save a few shifts.
     * More importantly, 16-bit arithmetic is then adequate (for 8-bit samples)
     * everywhere except in the multiplications proper; this saves a good deal
     * of work on 16-bit-int machines.
     *
     * The dequantized coefficients are not integers because the AA&N scaling
     * factors have been incorporated.  We represent them scaled up by PASS1_BITS,
     * so that the first and second IDCT rounds have the same input scaling.
     * For 8-bit JSAMPLEs, we choose IFAST_SCALE_BITS = PASS1_BITS so as to
     * avoid a descaling shift; this compromises accuracy rather drastically
     * for small quantization table entries, but it saves a lot of shifts.
     * For 12-bit JSAMPLEs, there's no hope of using 16x16 multiplies anyway,
     * so we use a much larger scaling factor to preserve accuracy.
     *
     * A final compromise is to represent the multiplicative constants to only