Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • getdp getdp
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 57
    • Issues 57
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 0
    • Merge requests 0
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • getdpgetdp
  • getdpgetdp
  • Merge requests
  • !87

Simple table onelab with list of double

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Nicolas Marsic requested to merge SimpleTableOnelabWithListOfDouble into master May 28, 2021
  • Overview 6
  • Commits 3
  • Pipelines 2
  • Changes 1

Hi Christophe,

This is a follow up of merge request !85 (closed) (sending tables via ONELAB).

I now follow the same strategy as in NodeTable and ElementTable, i.e. creating a static list populated by Tabular_PrintElement (where each fprintf is now followed by a .push_back).

The list is initiated in Format_PostHeader and sent via ONELAB in Format_PostFooter.

There are however two little details which I don't know how to treat:

  1. how should we handle FORMAT_VALUE_ONLY, as it involves strings (see line 858)?
  2. I don't understand the role of GetDPNumbers[CurrentName] and GetDPNumbersMap[CurrentName] (see lines 1545 and 1558).

Do you have any suggestions?

Have a nice weekend, Nicolas.

Edited Jun 02, 2021 by Nicolas Marsic
Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: SimpleTableOnelabWithListOfDouble