Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
C
cim
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
getdp
cim
Commits
cf5cdcf0
Commit
cf5cdcf0
authored
7 years ago
by
Nicolas Marsic
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
clean
parent
676dfba2
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
example/maxwell_linear/README.md
+1
-3
1 addition, 3 deletions
example/maxwell_linear/README.md
example/maxwell_sibc/README.md
+2
-1
2 additions, 1 deletion
example/maxwell_sibc/README.md
with
3 additions
and
4 deletions
example/maxwell_linear/README.md
+
1
−
3
View file @
cf5cdcf0
...
...
@@ -19,9 +19,7 @@ formulation, the variables:
doApply
fileName
are reserved for cim.py.
In order to check the solution, simply run:
are reserved for cim.py. In order to check the solution, simply run:
make ref
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
example/maxwell_sibc/README.md
+
2
−
1
View file @
cf5cdcf0
...
...
@@ -28,11 +28,12 @@ For the default parameters:
radius = 100 mm
conductivity = 1e15 S/m
the analytical resonance angular frequency for the fundamental mode should be
:
the analytical resonance angular frequency for the fundamental mode should be
8.22543e9+2.46361e1j
where j is the imaginary unit. This analytical result comes from the reference:
[
S. Papantonis and S. Lucyszyn, "Lossy spherical cavity resonators for
stress-testing arbitrary 3D eigenmode solvers," Progress In Electromagnetics
Research, vol. 151, pp. 151-167, 2015.
](
https://dx.doi.org/10.2528/PIER15031702
)
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment