Catia vs gmsh geometry construction
Hello, I use the same script in freefem for a problem of heat conduction but with 2 kinds of geometry construction: one is made with catia the other with gmsh and I receive different results. can you please explain to me the cause? there is the two files .geo geo_catia.rar
the peoblem that when i use one of these geometries with freefem script to resolve a heat conduction problem i receive different results: and this is the freefem script : test.edp
i change only the number of surfaces when i apply dirichlet B.C.