Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
getdp
getdp
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 25
    • Issues 25
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • getdp
  • getdpgetdp
  • Issues
  • #72

Closed
Open
Opened Jan 28, 2021 by Albert Piwonski@albertpiwonski

GetDP running on geometry data created by Gmsh API

Hello together,

I implemented a FEM in the Julia PL. I created a mesh by using the Julia Gmsh API. Now I want to compare my results with a GetDP solution (fixing the example "Magnetodynamics with cohomology conditions" to my problem). Is it necessary to backtranslate the Julia meshing file (.jl) into a Gmsh scripting language file (.geo)? Or does the GetDP (.pro) file only needs the physical group labels of the generated mesh?

Greeting, Albert

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: getdp/getdp#72